No One Like Albert Trott

The guy who cleared the Lord's pavilion.

Destiny. William Shakespeare is known to have famously remarked

“It is not in the stars to hold our destiny but in ourselves”.

Let’s go back to Melbourne, 1873 to make sense of this statement. Albert Trott was born. He burst into Test cricket for Australia in 1895 and left such an impression that the England captain called him “one of the finest cricketers Australia has ever produced.”

The crowd rewarded him not with riches but with a few guineas and a loaf of bread. In the three Tests he played for Australia, he averaged 102.50 with the bat. Australia cricket should have nurtured and taken care of him. But instead they let him go. Nobody knows why.

Even more cruel was his omission from an Australian side captained by his own brother, Harry Trott. There existed an opportunity of a shared dream but there was only a vacant spot. That rejection pushed Albert to look elsewhere for belonging.

A new home, a golden year

England became his refuge and his stage. After qualifying for Middlesex, Trott declared, “I shall make my home here,” and for a brief, blazing period, it felt like destiny finally agreed. In sport, there are years when a player becomes synonymous with the year they go beyond their limits and for Trott that year was 1899.

He completed the rare double of 1,000 runs and 200 wickets in a season, the mark of a complete all‑rounder. He launched a six off Monty Noble that famously cleared the Lord’s pavilion at Lord’s, was named a Wisden Cricketer of the Year, and followed up with a 10‑wicket haul against Somerset the very next season. A few years later, he produced a double hat‑trick against the same county, reinforcing the feeling that cricket had discovered its next enduring great.

Yet behind the numbers lurked a strange emptiness. For all his county heroics, Trott’s Test career stalled; neither England nor Australia chose to back him. The man who dominated for Middlesex found himself unwanted in the international arena, his destiny apparently rewritten in invisible ink.​

Glory without fame

Alcohol was his quiet antagonist. He “liked his drink a little too much,” and over time it crept into his bowling rhythm, fitness, and his life away from the ground. By 1902, weight and health issues had dulled his once-devastating bowling, and the aura of inevitability around his success began to fade.

As his form declined, so did his finances. Money grew scarce, and gambling worsened the damage. Cricket, once his sanctuary, started to drift out of reach, as if the game itself were stepping back from him.

Umpiring offered a fragile lifeline, a way to stay on the field even after his body betrayed him. But alcohol, nephralgia, and dropsy soon attacked this second career as well, stripping him of purpose and routine. He was sacked by Middlesex in 1910 and By 1911, even his wife and children deserted him.

Destiny, in one final act

Eventually, the suffering became more than he could bear. With his personal life shattered and his professional world gone, Albert Trott made the devastating decision to end his own life. He was just 41. The same hand that had once sent a cricket ball soaring over the Lord’s pavilion now held the pistol that ended his story.

He had written his will behind a laundry ticket, leaving behind his wardrobe and a sum of Pounds to his landlady. He was the last cricketer to have played for both Australia and England.

There is no single line that can neatly explain Trott, no tidy sentence that captures the man who climbed so high and fell so far. Still trying to make sense of Destiny? We all are. The fact remains there was no one like Trott.

---

New story drops every Wednesday!

In this blog, I unearth forgotten gems, celebrate historical triumphs, and explore the finest literature from the world of cricket.

If you find these stories meaningful, or if they show you why cricket is important on and off the field, consider sharing them or subscribing.

---

You may also like:

---